|
Written by www.greenaction.org
|
|
Friday, 31 August 2007 |
|
From California to Asia and beyond, communities are facing an unprecedented onslaught of proposals from waste treatment companies and entrepreneurs promoting a new generation of incineration technologies. Not since the waste industry tried to site hundreds of hazardous and solid waste incinerators in the United States in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s has there been such an intense effort to site new waste treatment facilities.
IncineratorsInDisguiseReportJune2006-1
|
|
Written by Nuclear Information Resource Service
|
|
Monday, 21 May 2007 |
|
News from NIRS
Nuclear Information and Resource Service
May 22, 2007
For Immediate Release
NIRS Contact:
Kevin Kamps 301-270-6477 ex 14
John Sticpewich 828-675-1792
Local Contacts:
Susan Corbett, Sierra Club of SC, 803-755-6929
Allison Peeler, Carolina Peace Resource Center, 864-357-8965
Leslie Minerd, HIPWAZEE, 803-799-9297
New Maps from Common Sense Campaign Reveal
Another Cost of New Nuclear Power: Southbound Mobile Chernobyl
May 22 - Today 33 community-based groups nationwide teamed with Nuclear
Information and Resource Service and the Common Sense at the Nuclear
Crossroads Campaign are releasing new maps showing the likely transport routes
(road, rail and water) that high-level radioactive waste (irradiated or spent
fuel) would take from nuclear power reactors to the federal Savannah River
Site in South Carolina for reprocessing, if that location is chosen under the
federal Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP). Eleven sites are currently
under consideration for GNEP; two in South Carolina. Implementation of GNEP
would redirect the transportation of this waste, previously assumed to target
the flawed and unsuitable Yucca Mountain site in Nevada.
Part of a study by John Sticpewich entitled "A Study of the Problems With
Transport and Reprocessing of Nuclear Waste in the Carolinas," the maps were
generated using Department of Energy (DOE) data and the on-line DOE routing
program, TRAGIS. "Credit analysts on Wall Street have suggested that moving
the accumulated high-level waste from the reactor sites would make investment
in new nuclear power more likely," said Sticpewich. "This report documents the
huge tonnage of radioactive waste that must be dealt with, the very high costs
of transporting it, and the potential for impact that such a move would have
on hundreds of communities along the way." John Sticpewich did this work on
behalf of the Common Sense at the Nuclear Crossroads Campaign based in
Asheville, NC. The maps and more information are available at Maps of Waste Routes.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Gerald Rudolph
|
|
Wednesday, 09 May 2007 |
Longtime activist uses political skills to keep issues on legislative agendas
By SAMMY FRETWELL -
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
For Ann Timberlake, a recent campaign to close a nuclear waste dump in South Carolina was like preserving the Congaree Swamp three decades ago.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Gerald Rudolph
|
|
Tuesday, 17 April 2007 |
|
Acccording to a report in the Tri-City Herald , shipping waste from contaminated building at Hanford may be coming to Savannah River Site,
According to reporter, Annette Cary,
The liquid waste facility is the last of the highly contaminated buildings
that DOE plans to take down for several years. Hanford officials are hoping
that they'll receive approval to start shipping weapons-grade plutonium now
stored at the Plutonium Finishing Plant to an off-site location, likely at
the Savannah River, S.C., site. That will take two or three years, then
several years of cleaning out buildings is planned.
Hanford Building Set for Demolition
|
|
|
Written by Gerald Rudolph
|
|
Tuesday, 17 April 2007 |
|
Nuclear Calendar
|
|
|
Written by Gerald Rudolph
|
|
Tuesday, 17 April 2007 |
|
The GAO has released a report on problems with construction programs involving 12 major DOE projects, including four over-budget SRS projects - Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, Salt Waste Processing Facility (high-level waste tratement), Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility (PDCF) and the Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF).
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Sammy Fretwell - The State
|
|
Friday, 06 April 2007 |
|
Panel's 16-0 vote effectively kills bill to keep Barnwell landfill open longer
By SAMMY FRETWELL -
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
A Utah company's push to dump more nuclear waste in Barnwell County
suffered a crippling defeat Wednesday that some legislators called
historic in its message to the nation:
South Carolina wants out of the nuclear waste disposal business after
three decades of owning a landfill for the country's radioactive garbage.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Friday, 06 April 2007 |
|
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD EXTENDED The Department of Energy (DOE)
will be announcing that it intends to extend the public
comment period for submitting comments on the scope of the Global
Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (GNEP PEIS) from April 4, 2007 to June 4, 2006. The
Federal Register notice announcing the extension will be available
on this website once it is published." http://www.gnep.energy.gov/PEIS/gnepPEIS.html
|
|
|
Written by Conservation Voters of SC
|
|
Friday, 06 April 2007 |
|
28 years to the day after the nation's worst nuclear accident, the
House Agricultural Committee voted unanimously to uphold the Atlantic Compact
and end South Carolina's
role as the nation's nuclear dumping ground.
Committee Chairman Billy Witherspoon's (R/Horry) bill (H.3545)
would have broken the Compact and kept South Carolina open to out-of-state
dumping for another fifteen years.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Raymond Shadis
|
|
Wednesday, 21 March 2007 |
|
Well here is the new radiation hazard symbol in graphic simplicity: the International Atomic
Energy Agency's newly adopted cross-cultural symbol for radiation
hazards. I suggest that it be immediately and widely disseminated
for the contemplation of those who have not yet gotten the message:
ionizing radiation in heavy dose (to body or individual cell)
causes cancer, genetic illness, birth defects, suppressed immune
systems, and a host of illnesses (and death) in both humans and
among our less articulate brethren in the biosphere. So run. er, So
run..if you can.
Text borrowed from Raymond Shadis
|
|
|
|